- Published on
Global Lens on Intangibles: ASC 805 vs IFRS 3 vs Ind AS 103
- Authors

- Name
- Ease Pro
Global Lens on Intangibles: ASC 805 vs IFRS 3 vs Ind AS 103
1. Introduction: Why This Matters
When companies acquire other businesses, the value isn't always in factories or inventory — it's often in ideas, relationships, and data. That's why recognizing intangible assets correctly is critical. But every region does it a little differently.
Let's explore how the US (ASC 805), international markets (IFRS 3/IAS 38), and India (Ind AS 103/38) approach this.
2. What Are These Standards?
🔹 ASC 805 – Business Combinations (US GAAP)
Governs how acquirers recognize assets, liabilities, and non- controlling interests.
Focuses on fair value allocation.
Explicit about recognizing identifiable intangibles separately from goodwill.
Common in the US for public companies, MNCs, and SEC
registrants.
🔹 Ind AS 103 & Ind AS 38 – Indian GAAP
Based on IFRS, with specific modifications for Indian regulatory and legal environments.
Adopted by Indian listed companies, banks, large unlisted companies.
🔹 IFRS 3 & IAS 38 – International Reporting
IFRS 3 applies to business combinations; IAS 38 governs intangible assets in general.
Globally used: EU, UK, Middle East, parts of Asia and Africa.
Similar to ASC 805 but more judgment-based in some areas.
3. Applicability Across Regions
While ASC 805 (US GAAP) sets the benchmark for acquisition accounting in US GAAP – SEC registrants, US- headquartered firms, IFRS (IAS 38 + IFRS 3) in Europe and Globally and Multinational companies outside the US and Ind AS (Ind AS 38 + Ind AS 103) in Indian listed companies, large private companies. They each aim to:
- Ensure consistency and comparability across M&A transactions.
- Avoid underreporting of key intangible drivers like brand value, software, or user base.
- Break down the purchase price into identifiable assets for transparency.
4. Recognition Criteria
All three standards generally agree on the recognition principles but differ subtly in implementation.
| Criteria for Recognition | ASC 805 | IAS 38 | Ind AS 38 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Probable future economic benefits | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| 2. Asset is identifiable (separable or contractual) | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| 3. Measurable reliably at fair value | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| 4. Acquired in a business combination | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
5. Key Differences – Deep Dive
| Area | ASC 805 (US GAAP) | IFRS 3 / IAS 38 | Ind AS 103 / 38 |
|---|---|---|---|
| R&D Recognition | Recognized if it meets separability/contractual tests | Usually expensed unless acquired | Similar to IFRS, with industry- specific notes |
| Internally Generated Intangible | Not recognized pre- acquisition | Generally not recognized | Not recognized |
| Measurement of Goodwill | Residual after FV allocation | Same | Same |
| Contingent Consideration | Recognized at fair value with changes to P&L | Same, but adjustments in OCI possible | May differ depending on RBI/SEBI |
| regulation | |||
| Bargain Purchase | Gain immediately | ||
| recognized in P&L | Requires reassessment and then gain in P&L | Same | |
| Revaluation Model | Not permitted | Permitted under IAS 38 (not IFRS 3) | Not permitted |
6. Why Understanding These Differences Matters
Multinational deals require careful navigation of local and international standards. Misjudging even small differences in intangibles can:
- Impact reported earnings Misstate goodwill
- Affect investor confidence
- Misalign with tax/regulatory treatment
So whether you're working on a cross-border acquisition or reporting to multiple regulatory bodies, mastering these frameworks gives you an edge.
