A seasonal business under cash pressure. 4–5 months of working capital runway in one quarter.
Success Story · Cash Flow · Seasonal consumer business (cyclical revenue model)
A US mid-market business with a strong high-season revenue line was running out of cash every off-season — profitable on an annual basis but constantly under pressure for four to five months of the year. We built a rolling 13-week cash flow forecast that pinpointed the exact timing and size of the off-season gap, used it to negotiate extended vendor credit, anchored a successful bank credit line application, and introduced a weekly payment-priority framework — adding four to five months of working capital runway and stabilising the business until the high-revenue season returned.
The ChallengeStrong revenue. Constant cash crunch. The two were not contradictions.
The business looked healthy on an annual P&L but spent four to five months a year managing payroll and supplier payments week by week. The founder was carrying the operating stress personally. Four problems were running in parallel and reinforcing each other.
- No view of the cash gap by week. Cash flow was tracked at a monthly grain and only after the fact. There was no forward-looking weekly view of when the off-season gap opened, how deep it went, or when it closed. Every cash decision was reactive — made on the morning of the payment, not in the weeks before.
- Vendor relationships running on goodwill, not terms. Key vendors were being paid on whatever cadence the bank balance allowed in any given week. Some were getting paid late without conversation; others were absorbing the strain quietly. Vendor goodwill was being spent without being managed — and there was no documented case to support a formal extension ask.
- A bank credit line that wasn’t being underwritten. The business had approached banks before but applications had stalled at the credit committee. The fundamental problem was documentation: no rolling forecast, no documented use-of-funds plan, no clear repayment story tied to the seasonal cycle. The underwriting question wasn’t whether the business deserved a facility — it was whether the numbers existed to support one.
- Founder bandwidth absorbed by cash management. For four to five months a year, the founder was effectively the part-time treasurer. Every payment cycle pulled time from growth decisions, customer relationships, and high-season preparation. The opportunity cost was real and compounding — and there was no path out without a proper cash flow forecasting system in place.
What We DidOne core deliverable, one framework.
This was not a profitability problem — it was a working-capital timing problem, solved with a timing instrument. The core deliverable was a rolling 13-week cash flow forecast, refreshed every Monday, that pinpointed the exact timing and depth of the off-season gap. Around it we built a simple priority-plan framework that turned the forecast into decisions — ranking every payable each week, and giving the business the documented case it needed to negotiate extended vendor terms and to secure a bank working-capital credit line. We built it once and handed it to the internal finance team, with an operating manual, recorded walkthroughs, and a four-week shadow period, so the cadence was theirs to run.
The OutcomeWhat changed in one quarter.
By the end of the engagement, the rolling cash flow forecast was being refreshed every Monday by the controller. The weekly payment-priority review was happening on the same Monday, with the founder out of the loop on routine payment decisions. The bank credit line was drawn down to forecast, not to panic. Vendor relationships were on documented extended terms, repayment tracked against the forecast. The off-season cash crunch had stopped being the dominant operating constraint.
“Before EasePro, the off-season was something I survived. I was making payment decisions on the morning each invoice came due. After the forecast went live, the off-season became something I planned for — and the bank conversation became a different conversation entirely.”
Figures shown are illustrative — based on a real engagement, anonymised and rounded for client confidentiality.