“Anant is one of the few people I trust to tackle complex financial challenges, because he consistently delivers high-quality results. His expertise in FP&A, financial modeling, and Excel is exceptional.”
Financial Modeling Services for every decision worth getting right.
Should you take the bank loan? Can the business support the acquisition? Is this hire affordable if the largest client delays? These questions have answers — finding them requires a financial model, not instinct and not a spreadsheet that adds up last year's revenue. And the model needs to keep working after the decision — most do not.
- Built by professionals from global advisory firms
- Experienced finance professionals
- Four-eye review on every model
- One-off or retainer · No lock-in
Every major business decision deserves a model. Most are made without one.
A loan. An acquisition. A pricing change. A hire that adds 15% to fixed cost. Each one is a bet — and most are placed on instinct and a spreadsheet that only adds up last year.
Which of these business decisions requires a financial model right now?
Lender asking for projections you cannot produce.
Pricing your work without knowing the true cost.
No unit economics — no idea if the model works.
PE sponsor asking for a model you don’t have.
Buying or selling a business without a model.
An existing model that is quietly broken.
From free call to a model that survives due diligence.
Clarity call
30 minutes. We confirm the decision the model must support.
Half-day assessment
A brief note on the decision and the key drivers involved.
Roadmap & scope
Agreed model type, deliverables, and fee. No minimum term.
First deliverable
Your first deliverable, built and passed through our four-eye review.
Cadence or handover
Walk-through, documentation, and access to update it anytime.
What financial modeling engagement
looks like in practice.
Real engagements from our modeling team.
Two Costly Mistakes in an Existing Model Forced a Pricing Reset and a Hiring Slowdown
A growth-stage SaaS business asked us to review the financial model behind its board reporting and upcoming fundraise. Two costly mistakes surfaced: cloud hosting costs were forecast too low — the model assumed they would rise in a straight line with revenue, when in reality they climb in steps and speed up as usage grows; and the true cost of winning a customer was understated, because sales salaries, advertising, and content spending had been lumped in with general expenses instead of counted as the cost of acquiring customers. Once corrected, the model showed the real profit on each customer — the business repriced two products, slowed sales hiring, and refocused on higher-margin customers.
Unit Economics Model Revealed Revenue Per Transaction Was Below Gateway Charges Alone
A FinTech company running high transaction volume had no per-transaction profitability model. Our unit economics build mapped revenue per transaction against every direct cost — payment gateway, processing, chargebacks, support. The finding was stark: revenue per transaction was below the payment gateway charge alone, so every transaction generated a loss before overheads. The product was discontinued and capital redirected.
Five model types we build,
scoped to the decision you are making.
Not every business needs all five. A founder raising a Series A needs the fundraising model. A business preparing for sale needs the DCF and M&A model. A lender refinancing needs the 3-statement model with covenant tests. We scope to the decision, build to advisory-firm standards, and stay accessible to update the model as the business evolves.
3-Statement Financial Model
P&L, balance sheet, and cash flow — linked, driver-based, no plug.
- Integrated P&L, balance sheet, and cash flow
- Driver-based revenue and cost assumptions
- Base / stress / upside scenario toggles
- Working capital cycle, debt schedule, depreciation built correctly
Fundraising & Investor Model
An investor-ready model that survives due-diligence scrutiny.
- Cap table with full waterfall and dilution scenarios
- Use-of-funds and runway under base / stress assumptions
- LTV / CAC, payback period, gross margin walk by cohort
- Investor presentation tab — clean output for pitch deck
DCF Valuation Model
A DCF that holds up — driver-built, with WACC and sensitivities.
- Explicit-period DCF with driver-based projections
- Terminal value (Gordon growth and exit-multiple methods)
- WACC build with comparable company analysis
- Two-way sensitivity tables on WACC, growth, multiples
M&A Model
The model that closes the deal — accretion, synergies, structure.
- Accretion / dilution analysis under multiple deal structures
- Synergy modeling — revenue, cost, working capital
- EBITDA bridge and quality of earnings adjustments
- Diligence-ready output for buyer or seller
Strategic Decision Model with Scenario Modeling
One decision, modelled precisely across base, stress, and upside.
- Decision-specific P&L and cash impact
- Sensitivity analysis on top 3 assumptions
- Break-even, payback period, IRR / NPV
- Recommendation memo with quantified rationale
Download the 3-Statement Model Starter Template — Free
The pre-linked 3-statement template our team builds on.
Download Free Template →In their own words.
“I've personally used EasePro for financial modeling, valuation analysis, and beautifully designed decks. The work is always first class, very detail-oriented and highly professional — and most of all, they're just really great people to work with.”
“It's been a good addition to our firm. My recommendation to anyone is that this is a trusted relationship you can build — and you'll be pleasantly surprised.”
Built for your industry's specific complexity.
A generic playbook doesn't work across industries. We tailor every engagement to your sector's dynamics.
Practical financial modeling questions
most US business owners ask.
What skills should a financial modeler have?
A real financial modeler needs depth across eight areas:
- 1. 3-statement integrity — P&L, balance sheet, cash flow linked correctly with no plug
- 2. Driver-based forecast logic — revenue, cost, headcount driven by operational assumptions, not hard-coded growth rates
- 3. Valuation methodologies — DCF, comparables, precedent transactions, LBO logic where relevant
- 4. Cap table and dilution math — SAFE notes, convertible debt, option pool, anti-dilution
- 5. Scenario and sensitivity analysis — base, stress, upside with data tables
- 6. Accounting accuracy — US GAAP, working capital cycle, deferred revenue, capitalisation
- 7. Excel discipline — clear input/output separation, no circular references, audit-friendly structure
- 8. Business communication — translating model output into a story for boards, investors, and lenders
A modeler strong in two or three of these builds spreadsheets. A modeler covering all eight builds models that survive due diligence. EasePro modeling engagements are led by experienced finance professionals from global advisory firms with deep backgrounds across all eight areas — and every model passes through a four-eye internal review before delivery. More about our team →
How do I evaluate a financial modeling consultant before hiring?
Five practical tests that work regardless of who you're evaluating:
- Ask for a sample 3-statement model — not a template — and inspect the linkages. A real modeler can show you that net income flows correctly to retained earnings, that depreciation hits cash flow properly, and that the balance sheet balances without a plug.
- Hand them three months of P&Ls and ask them to build a 12-month projection in front of you. A real modeler does this in 30–45 minutes with clear assumptions; reporting providers will stall.
- Ask them to walk through a real DCF they have built — terminal value methodology, WACC build, sensitivity tables. If they cannot defend the terminal value assumption, the DCF is a guess.
- Ask whether their models include scenario toggles (base / stress / upside) and a data table for sensitivity. Most modelers do not include these by default.
- Request two references from current clients in your industry or similar size, and ask those references specifically about model integrity, scenario depth, and what they would change about the engagement.
Most modelers cannot pass all five. We welcome every one of these tests in our discovery process — and we walk a prospect through a live 12-month projection build in the first call if it is the right fit. Book a free 30-minute call to test us →
What is the difference between a financial model, a budget, and a forecast?
A budget is a target — what you intend to spend and earn in a defined period. A forecast is a projection — what you currently expect based on actual trends, updated regularly. A financial model is the underlying engine — a workbook where changeable assumptions flow through to every line.
Budgets and forecasts are outputs. The model is the system that produces them. A business with no model can produce a number; a business with a model can produce a decision. See how the model powers an FP&A engagement →
When does a business need a financial model — and which type?
You need a financial model when a decision touches multiple parts of your business at once. Common triggers and the matching model type:
- Raising capital — Fundraising model with cap table, dilution math, and use-of-funds
- Preparing for sale or acquisition — DCF and M&A model with EBITDA bridge
- Refinancing or applying for debt — 3-statement model with covenant tests
- Entering a new market or product line — Strategic decision model with sensitivity
- Board reporting that has outgrown a P&L — 3-statement model with KPI dashboard overlay
The right model depends on the decision. EasePro builds all five core types — see the Deliverables section above for details on each.
Do I need a one-off model or an ongoing modeling retainer?
Most modeling work is project-based, but models age fast. EasePro offers both formats. Project-based covers fundraising rounds, M&A, valuations, and board presentations — deliverable: the model plus full handover documentation. Ongoing retainer maintains the model on an ongoing cadence — updating actuals, refreshing assumptions, adding scenarios.
Model lifecycle note: The model that won a Series A 12 months ago is wrong today because the business has changed. Many engagements start project-based and convert to retainer once the model becomes a daily decision tool.
We also re-engage on models we built earlier when clients need updates — even if the original engagement closed. The fee for an update is materially below the fee for a rebuild from scratch.
How is EasePro different from other financial modeling firms?
Three differences:
- Senior leadership. Our modeling practice is led by Anchal Singhal, Co-Founder & Director of Valuations & Modeling, with deep global advisory firm experience.
- Four-eye review. Every model passes through a four-eye internal review before delivery — built by one senior, reviewed by another against integrity, driver logic, scenario toggles, and presentation.
- Lifetime maintenance. Clients can re-engage us to update the model when assumptions change, when a new round starts, or when leadership asks a question the current build cannot answer.
Pricing context: Scope-based — typically materially below the $5,000–$15,000 that comparable US modeling firms charge for equivalent depth.
A model that survives due diligence is built once. Then maintained for life.
Book a free 30-minute finance clarity call. No pitch. We review the decision the model needs to support, identify which type fits, and tell you the scope you actually need. If we're not the right fit, we point you somewhere better.