A single reporting standard across portfolio companies (for PE/VC funds and family offices) or operating entities (for multi-entity groups and MNCs) — built by experienced finance professionals from global advisory firms.
Either way, what lands on your desk every month is fragmented — different formats, different ledger codes, different fiscal calendars. Apple-to-apple comparison becomes a manual rebuild every cycle.
Which of these is slowing your reporting cycle right now?
30 minutes. We map the portfolio or entity tree and the pain.
A written scoping note before any template is built.
Agreed deliverables, cadence, and fee. Scope-based, no lock-in.
Your standardised reporting template, built and parallel-run first.
Monthly cadence plus quarterly portfolio or group health checks.
A UK-headquartered luxury sports group operating across the US, UK, and Middle East was preparing to raise capital for a new facility. We built the consolidated financial model and rolling monthly reports and surfaced material cost inefficiencies — above-market payroll, high leases, and inventory build-up. The group was profitable on paper but had no real cash profit underneath. Costs were rationalised, the funding plan paused, and twelve months of clean cash performance followed — the new line is now planned on internal cash.
A mid-market manufacturing group with 20 operating entities was running blind on group cash — each entity on its own cycle and format, treasury seeing consolidated cash only three weeks after month-end. We built a unified 13-week forecast with entity-level drill-down, ran it weekly with the internal team, and uncovered $4M+ of trapped working capital in inter-entity timing mismatches.
The first three are built for funds running portfolios of investee companies. The next three are built for multi-entity groups consolidating operating subsidiaries. Not every engagement uses all six — the scope is calibrated to your portfolio size, entity count, reporting cadence, and the depth required.
One format across every portfolio company — directly comparable.
An independent check that surfaces what founders don’t say.
LP-ready, one-page dashboards from a single template.
Consolidated P&L, balance sheet, and cash flow on a locked cadence.
Every inter-entity balance reconciled and disclosed each month.
One template per entity — compare margin and cost like-for-like.
A one-page anonymised sample of the dashboard we build.
Download free sample →“Anant is one of the few people I trust to tackle complex financial challenges, because he consistently delivers high-quality results. His expertise in FP&A, financial modeling, and Excel is exceptional.”
“I've personally used EasePro for financial modeling, valuation analysis, and beautifully designed decks. The work is always first class, very detail-oriented and highly professional — and most of all, they're just really great people to work with.”
“It's been a good addition to our firm. My recommendation to anyone is that this is a trusted relationship you can build — and you'll be pleasantly surprised.”
A generic playbook doesn't work across industries. We tailor every engagement to your sector's dynamics.
You impose a standardised reporting template on every portfolio company submission. The template defines a common chart of accounts mapping, a fixed KPI definition list per business model (SaaS / commerce / services / manufacturing), a consistent close-day expectation, and a standardised commentary section.
EasePro builds this template once, then onboards each portfolio company onto it — typically with a 60-90 day parallel run before the new format goes live. The result: the 10 monthly reports your fund receives are directly comparable, and the fund team stops spending the first week of every cycle reformatting before any analysis can happen.
Regular independent financial health checks — quarterly or half-yearly — conducted by a finance professional sitting between the fund and the portfolio company. The check looks specifically at: revenue recognition timing relative to cash receipt, expense deferral patterns near reporting periods, working capital movements that do not match revenue growth, related-party transaction volumes, covenant compliance, and cash runway calculations against reported burn.
The objective is to surface what the founder did not say. By scheduling these reviews independently of crises, the fund converts what would otherwise be reactive intervention into structured early-warning signal.
The practical cadence is half-yearly for stable portfolio companies and quarterly for companies in higher-risk situations — newer investments, companies approaching the next funding round, businesses with covenant risk, or companies in a sector or geography under pressure.
Most funds today review portfolio company financials only when a problem becomes visible, which is too late for meaningful intervention. A scheduled review converts the same work into an early-warning system. The reviews should be conducted independently of the portfolio company’s own monthly reporting, by a finance professional reporting to the fund, not the founder.
Fund administration and portfolio reporting sit at opposite ends of the same data flow. A fund administrator handles fund-side accounting — NAV calculation, LP capital account tracking, fund-level financial statements, regulatory filings. That work sits at the fund vehicle level.
Portfolio reporting (EasePro) standardises and audits financial information coming up from each operating company in the portfolio — operating-company-level work. The two are complementary, not competing. Fund administrators do not dig into the operating books of each portfolio company. EasePro does that work.
Yes. Portfolio companies typically run on different software and no switch is required. Supported environments: QuickBooks, Xero, NetSuite, Tally, Zoho Books, and most local ERPs. The standardised reporting template sits on top of whatever accounting software each company uses.
Each portfolio company maps its native chart of accounts to the common reporting template, then submits the standardised report monthly. EasePro builds the mapping logic during onboarding and trains the in-house finance team at each portfolio company to maintain it.
Three components handle this. First, a standardised monthly close template that every entity reports against in a common format, regardless of the underlying accounting software. Second, a fiscal-year normalisation layer in the consolidation model that aligns each entity’s data to the group reporting calendar. Third, a consistent FX translation policy applied to every foreign-currency entity.
The consolidation model is built once and operated monthly — producing consolidated group financials alongside standalone rolling forward monthly reports for each entity in the same cycle. No software switch is required at any subsidiary.
A free 30-minute scoping call. No pitch. We confirm whether your portfolio or group reporting needs match our scope, and what an engagement would look like.